Tuesday, December 11, 2007

Benefits of piracy for underdeveloped countries

Can our judgment be affected by the country where we live? I think, without any doubts, people will say “yes”. But here is laying another question with great importance. Whose judgment is more correct? One of the issues that are raised between developed and undeveloped countries is adherence to the patents and intellectual property. There are a lot of arguments going from both sides but I will focus only on one of them. Why undeveloped countries do not enforce intellectual property laws? Because piracy support in the long run is more economically profitable for developing a country.

With the fast pace of manufacturing revolution starting at the end of nineteenth century, differences in speed of advancing created need for intellectual property law defense. After about a century of constant development those laws guarantee that authors will get paid for the work that they did. Moreover, one of major requirements for import of intellectual property to undeveloped countries is existence of laws that will protect it from improper use.

Sadly enough there is a huge difference between existence of the law and implementation of the same law. For the countries with young democracy and without highly developed economy piracy, sometimes, is the only answer to the question how to be competitive. For example, Russian Federation, during nineties was the country with low to none respect to the intellectual property. At the same time, same period had the highest rate of engineers invited to developed countries to work. Reasons for that were good education, lower pay rate and familiarity and proficiency with wide variety of programming tools and products. In order to prepare trained specialist, company in developed country were entitled to buy expensive software, provide training and pay more for qualified specialist. People that have been invited to work from Russia were already trained and were asking for much less pay. Definitely this scheme hurts and raises anger from labor force back in developed country but it is more profitable for the given company. At the same time, specialists when they return back to their countries have valuable experience that helps business and economy back in their country. They are becoming middle and upper management familiar with work ethic and guidelines that can help their businesses.

On another hand, there is a huge social difference in income. Let’s consider, for example, cost of license of windows operating system. For developed countries, this is a cost that can be substituted from family budget within two months period without any sacrifices in food, cloth or other basic needs products. In underdeveloped countries, this amount of money for middle class family will be total income of the family for given two months. Moreover, in a lot of cases this might be a total income of the family for the calendar year. In such case, when given an option to buy a license for a full price or to buy a pirated version for a fraction of that, clear winner in this race will be pirated disk.

Nowadays, same examples of achieving success for the cost of others are shown by Republic of China and India. Is there a solution and light in the end of the tunnel? I think there is. Slowly but surely, straggling countries start to develop their own intellectual property and start to stand behind their own authors. But, until this process is wide spread in given countries I don’t think I will see any movements. Due to the fact, that is not beneficial neither to the population, not to the governments.

Comparison of pluses and minuses between free and paid software

There are two main categories of software that available for usual users on today’s market. They are free and proprietary software. Both of those categories include a huge variety of licenses that modifies user interaction with a company on legal field and ability of user to modify, change and distribute software. In order to simplify discussion, let me separate all available software into two general categories: paid one, where you pay immediately or after a period of time usually called “trial period”, and free one, where users have an option to do not pay anything regardless of timeframe of usage. Another important factor will be idea of alternatives, where software can or cannot easily be substituted for an alternative. Let me show some plusses and minuses of both categories in order to simplify decision of choosing software that user might prefer using in his/her life or, possibly, recommending to coworkers, top level managers and businesses.

First and most popular among users is paid category or, in other words, proprietary software. Plusses of this software category are the following:

  1. Value. Users are expecting to get some value when they paying for something from their own pocket and in most cases they are.
  2. Quality. Usually this is a stable, well developed product with support on basic features of the program.
  3. Updates. Includes free updates within one version of the program with bug fixes and new features.
  4. Easy of use. Have standard “windows like” interface that is familiar and easy to use or learn and have well written documentation. At the same time it is very easy to find help with this program outside developing company. For example, friends or tech forums on internet accessible with search engines. In most cases, user shouldn’t be tech savvy to install program.

Downsides of the proprietary software are the following:

  1. Price. It could be anywhere from “free after mail-in rebates” for simple program to hundreds of thousands dollars for corporate level program.
  2. No freedom. Once user choose his/her favorite program it is very hard to switch to alternatives in future when better program is discovered.
  3. Features. In most cases of software making business models, whenever major convenient feature is introduced new version of the program is released. It means that users asked to pay one more time in order to get that particular feature. Very high Total Cost of Ownership. In some cases, use of new features requires transition to new data format that will make data incompatible with older versions of the same program.
  4. Size and Speed. Common trend is that the higher number version of the program is, size of the program is bigger and speed of execution is slower.
  5. High cost of upgrades.

Another category is free software. This largely sector of small program and utilities and, in fact, is alternative to paid category of programs. Main benefits of free software are:

1. Price. Very affordable for any social level of users.

2. Accessibility of developers. If users have any comment or suggestion, developers can easily be reached. In most cases convenient features implemented in reasonable time frame and users should not be large corporate customers to initiate that.

3. Freedom. Easy to switch to alternative program due to wide open data formats support.

4. Free upgrades for the life of the product.

5. Small size and usually high speed of execution even on outdated hardware.

On the other hand free software ahs its own minuses that can’t be ignored or avoided during process of consideration. Main flaws of this category are:

  1. Free software comes with little or no support. Even though community around free software is very supportive, in case of rare or special purpose programs it is very hard to get question answered.
  2. Quality of free software ranges from outstanding to subpar. Rule of thumb is that with more developers work and support product the better quality is.
  3. Hard to use. In most cases users are required to spend time to get familiar with new interface and features in order to use software. Sometimes, this time could be very large.

I hope this description of main software parameters will help average user to make an educated decision. Important thing to keep in mind is that no matter if you get software for free or paid money for it, it should be convenient to use and solve problems effectively.

Tuesday, October 2, 2007

During my life I think I have seen plenty of them. New ones, old ones, rusty from the weather and time, fashionable designed for 2 people in coupe and cheapest ones where people had been packed like fish in cans. Fast ones for long distances and stripped to the bare bones for local communications. Couple of them were shaking and rumbling in such fashion that they could create serious competition to the rollercoaster’s nowadays. Some of them were cleaned better than military barracks while others included free trip to the “Insects in Our Life” for the price of a single ticket one. In my country people even developed a small language to describe them: “teplushka”, “electrichka”, “poezd”, “spal’nyi reis”, “tovarnyi”, to name a few. Right now trains are much different from what they were when I was a kid. Never the less, in my opinion one thing didn’t change at all. Trains are still a mirror that is reflecting, in a smaller scale, the world that we are living in and bringing with us on every trip.

My usual morning, probably as many other people, starts with shower and cup of coffee that I, as a rule, will be finishing in the car commuting to the nearest BART train station. Quick cigarette, on my way from free parking spot at one of the shopping plazas which surround station, calm down my senses after rush traffic on freeways and puts me in indifferent mood. Right now I can observe and care less about my next 43 minute travel. With light clicking noise terminal read my ticket and puts time stamp on it to charge me at destination station. Elevator, like gates in attraction where you patiently need to wait in order to receive your portion of attraction, slowly brings me to the platform. I feel irony and small touch of satisfaction glimpse deep inside of me when I look at the people who just passed me on elevator with their backpacks always hanging on the right shoulder and shirt matching ties and right now impatiently walking on the platform waiting for their train. My journey will begin shortly.

Platforms at each side have markings which show where door will be. I find that this guidance and separation is very convenient. From time to time I can see how lines start to form at the places where door will stop. For me, it is very unusual to see. In my mind lines always a sign of people trying to get something rare, desirable or high importance. Can a door of a train be such a thing? I would not say so. Although, from station to station, this picture changes. To me it looks like it has straightforward correlation with neighborhoods that train is passing. At some stations, with blocks of houses, which look exactly like twins on the picture, with same colored roofs and carefully trimmed grass which surround station and reach towards orange-paled hills, I see a kaleidoscope of people standing in multiple lines waiting for the train. On others, surrounded by blocks of simple houses and crazy mix of buildings that represents neither a typical city style, not a village style, a mob of people falls in faceless grey line while train moves past them. Separation in society for careful observer starts right there.

My train comes and journey begins. People rush through the door and first lucky winners in this little game start to look around with hungry eyes for best seats in this uniformal train where seats divided equally to front and back faced ones. Strange fact which mirrors our outside world of individuals – no one has a neighbor sitting next to them unless they, in my guess, in intimate relations of some sort. Even people, who seem to know each other and chatting, are taking different seats. More than ones I see people going from one wagon of the train to another in search of seats without other passengers. When most of the peoples are seated my attentions switches to the ones who is not. Those are running through the train and picking newspapers that are lying all over the floor, under seats and next to the passengers. This is the papers left by earlier commuters and has everything from financial news to sport and leisure. When they find the right one, sense of deep satisfaction and relief brings light from within on their faces. It doesn’t last long though. Faces quickly turns to serious business look mask and, minding only themselves, they finally settle down on the places that left unattended. Now technology and fashion show begins.

It is five to seven minutes before train will leave the platform and when it could be the better time to chat? Almost simultaneously, as someone invisible fired gun to start, people start to dig in their pockets, purses, briefcases and backpacks to get their cell phones. With serious look on their faces and, of course, discussing matters of life and death, show off starts. It seems to me that people are trying to impress each other and to show, that their presence on the train is just a mistake and unfortunate coincidence. They would rather drive in traffic in their convertibles and vans than be here. It’s not prestigious to take public transportation nowadays. Looks like having a car and sharing traffic experience in Bay Area, one of the top 10 busiest places in the USA, makes a statement about persons income and social status. It shows success in life. At the same time, if someone would be interested to make sociology survey about people in who is taking train, I have an idea that should be kept in mind during survey. In order not to make a mistake in calculations about success, judgment should be based on sum of jewelry and cell for a woman and rather phone itself for a man. Back in the wagon telephone conversations are going at increasing pace. As a rule, the better I can hear someone, the less informative conversation is taking place. Being raised on the principles that it is not polite to listen to others conversations, in most cases I don’t have any other choice, except to start my musical player and increase volume to the level where music effectively outperforms conversations. Actually, I think my player is a one of the signs of experienced rider. Because by the time train leaves the station, about third of the wagon have wires sticking from their ears in order to separate themselves from the world.

On the other hand wagon has plenty of people who do not participate in show. Instead of cell phones they reach for their books, working papers, laptops or organizers. It doesn’t matter what outfit they wear. They are working “bees” and just don’t have time for anything else. They have a goal and all wonders of the entire world can pass by unnoticed. They don’t care and don’t need it. They live in their own. From time to time, stroke of life goes through them when they pick their heads in windows to see what station is coming and in second or two they are back to the stance where they came from. I wonder if their entire life is like that. I hope not. However, average working hours in our society have increased and I have very slim chance that I am right.

Last, but not the least, people who just follow the stream. They are looking at the windows, glancing at people around them, sitting and thinking their own thoughts or trying to catch a nap while train leaves miles behind. Norms of society kept strict even at such closed space where, by nature, people tend to come closer to each other. No one looks at other person more than a quick glimpse. Sometimes it’s curious, sometimes evaluating, or, more often, blank. The same way as we look at things that surrounds us.

My trip is over and with, as I hear, sounds of satisfaction terminal charges my pass ticket on my way out. I am joining crowd of rushing people who is trying to be somewhere on time or already running late. Artificial lights at underground station slowly giving up their positions to the natural sunlight coming from above with every step I take towards the exit. I am leaving prepared from static mirrored image of life and ready for deep dive in real one.

Tuesday, September 18, 2007

Do people like suffering?

This post is about the topic which has been brought in class today. Popular idea is that people in order to create need to suffer so the author has something to tell about. I would agree with other idea that, in contrary, people might not like to suffer themselves but people definitely like to read, watch or hear about authors suffering experience. Not that many people do enjoy other peoples success or happiness in my personal experience. And, actually, I think that our everyday environment is a good proof of this concept. Lets take news programs for example. Just take a half an hour and count about how many good things are presented there. I am willing to bet my money that for all of them, not including sport and weather, just one hand would be more than enough. Blockbuster movies, top-seller books, anecdotes in everyday communications and popular theater plays are all have one in common. They are talking or playing around problems in someones else life. Popularity speaks for itself.

Sunday, September 16, 2007

Napkins ... how simple things can be a form of art

While I was thinking about what fast-food restaurant I want to go to today, random browsing through Internet brought interesting discovery that I would like to share:
http://www.napkinfoldingguide.com/
IMHO, "must read" category for anyone related to food service business :)

Saturday, September 15, 2007

First post


Let me start with the point that writing is not as easy as I thought. Even considering the fact that I personally signed up for writing every day, I will be trying to avoid garbage posts like " Oh my! I pet my cat twice today ... And I'm listening to 'blah-blah' album today ... weather is good." and so on.


So the topic that I would like to bring up today is a process of creation. My idea is that even though a person has a lot of roads to choose from, I think at the moment when the brain starts to think about certain ideas, words that are chosen are limiting the creativity.

What is a word by itself? In simple terms, a "word" is a description of experience that a human is getting with object interaction. At the same time it heavily relies on human experience during his or her life. For example, how would you explain a mango to a person who never ate it or has never seen it? I consider the process of creation is when you don't know the final result at the beginning of creation. Examples will be free-style in painting or improvisation in music. Writing, on the other hand, requires choosing words by the author to outline the ideas and is more challenging and limiting. I think, I can say that writing requires more hard work because it requires that the message being communicated be understood by the target audience. It's like playing a game with a prescribed set of rules. Which brings a question if is writing a real process of creativity or just simply "playing a game"?